"Active learning" boosts grades, reduces failure rates in undergraduate STEM classes, concludes major review
Via Gust MEES
Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Alfredo Corell's curator insight,
December 27, 2012 9:01 AM
By Jeff Dunn
With a public four year in-state degree costing $89,044 on average it’s easy to see why anyone would be looking for alternatives. MOOCs, Massive Open Online Courses, may be the solution. Since the first MOOC in 2008, this phenomenon has been spreading amongst very well accredited colleges. The movement has grown rapidly with over 100 courses already scheduled for 2013. |
Alfredo Corell's curator insight,
August 16, 2013 10:30 AM
Autor: Omar A. Flores Laguna algunos ítems evaluados (como la relación entre la Biblia y la materia impartida) chirrían considerablemente. En cambio otros resultan perfectamente adecuados para evaluar nuestra tarea docente |
Freeman says he’s started using such techniques even in large classes. “My introductory biology course has gotten up to 700 students,” he says. “For the ultimate class session—I don’t say lecture—I’m showing PowerPoint slides, but everything is a question and I use clickers and random calling. Somebody droning on for 15 minutes at a time and then doing cookbook labs isn’t interesting.” Freeman estimates that scaling up such active learning approaches could enable success for tens of thousands of students who might otherwise drop or fail STEM courses.
A bold statement...
aulas expositivas nao sao apenas chatas, sao ineficientes para aprendizagem também...