Education 2.0 & 3.0
148.6K views | +3 today
Follow
Education 2.0 & 3.0
All about learning and technology
Curated by Yashy Tohsaku
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from iPads, MakerEd and More in Education
Scoop.it!

Is That Higher-Order Task Really Higher Order? - Jennifer Gonzalez @cultofpedagogy

Is That Higher-Order Task Really Higher Order? - Jennifer Gonzalez @cultofpedagogy | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it
It’s kind of a given that most teachers want their students to be doing rigorous, challenging work. Ask any teacher, “Is it your goal to simply have students regurgitate facts in your class?” and every time, the answer will probably be no.

And yet, that exact thing is happening more often than we realize.

It’s not for lack of trying: For years, teachers have consulted their Bloom’s flip charts and DOK wheels to choose the verbs that are meant to represent higher levels of thinking. In a lot of cases, though, while the right verbs are being used, the tasks they represent aren’t actually on the level teachers think they are.

Over the years I’ve seen teachers make two specific mistakes with higher-order thinking tasks more often than any other, so I’m going to drill down and focus just on those two mistakes here.

Via John Evans
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from Eclectic Technology
Scoop.it!

5 Assessment Strategies Every Teacher Should Know

5 Assessment Strategies Every Teacher Should Know | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it

"Most teachers and current textbooks offer varied approaches to the material to be learned so the teaching can be brain-compatible with the varied student learning styles. It is only logical that respect for these individual learning styles be incorporated into assessment forms."


Via Beth Dichter
Christopher Resetar's curator insight, February 13, 2014 12:00 PM

Like other comments on this scoop, I really like this article, especially items #1 and #2.  I really like those options because they are unconventional options that I still think would provide an appropriate level of challenge for the students as well as provide an alternative form of just a simple pencil and paper exam.  I think option #1 is more feasible for elementary school because it would allow students to work on skills that are more age appropriate like consolidation of information and looking for quality source material.

Ruby Day's curator insight, February 14, 2014 3:45 PM

Sounds like some great ideas to stimulate critical thinking

Audrey's curator insight, March 5, 2014 6:51 PM

All 5 assessment methods involves  students leading the learning. Asking the students questions based on their reading of the topic helps their analytical  skills and allows them to be in charge of their learning. 

Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from Eclectic Technology
Scoop.it!

Bloom's Taxonomy: Teacher Planning Kit

Bloom's Taxonomy: Teacher Planning Kit | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it

Via Beth Dichter
Beth Dichter's curator insight, March 28, 2014 9:41 PM

This pdf file is fairly large and looks at the original version of Bloom's Taxonomy but it is an in-depth look that moves from the lower ordering thinking skills to the higher order thinking skills and includes a definition for each level as well as:

* Key Words - an extensive list for each level

* Actions and Outcomes for each level

* Questions specific to each level

To access the full pdf: 

http://educatingmatters.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/blooms_taxonomy_teacher_planning_kit1.pdf 

Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from Eclectic Technology
Scoop.it!

Scaffold Like an Ant- A simple scaffolding example

Scaffold Like an Ant- A simple scaffolding example | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it
I am teaching a class where I allow the students a set amount of time to draw out what they know about a subject. Today, the students did their pre-class work, then came to class, and we began to d...

Via Beth Dichter
Beth Dichter's curator insight, November 9, 2013 8:20 PM

Check out this infographic which focuses on scaffolding for deeper understanding. Mia MacMeekin has provided a nine step process.

1. Ask a question.

2. Present a mystery for students to solve.

3. Ask students to draw what they know.

4. Give students ample time to research the mystery.

5. Ask students to draw the mystery and the solution again.

6. Ask students to share their drawings with other students.

7. Ask students to pull their ideas together in one drawing.

8. Teacher patiently asks what if questions.

9. If students needs more information, send them back to step #4, and start over again until the outcome or objective is reached.

MacMeekin notes that her students were engaged in the drawing/scaffolding phase of this and reached a deeper understanding than other classes had. It is also important to note that the ant is actually an analogy. To learn more click through to the post.

Spice Wang's curator insight, November 15, 2013 6:52 PM

How much time teachers would need this kind of problem-solving based scaffolding activity? When to use Thisbe kind of approach?